The Vaccination

The belief in the absolute protection from vaccination remains unbroken, although there were already signs of the ineffectiveness and harmfulness of vaccinations in 1968. The following text demonstrates what the "protection" looks like using the example of an extensive field experiment in India using the tuberculosis vaccine.

Example of the tuberculosis vaccine

Quote from Dr. med. Gerhard Buchwald, "Der Rückgang der Schwindsucht trotz Schutzimpfung", Verlag Hirthammer

"There are countries which have inoculated continuously with the BCG vaccine (the tuberculosis vaccine) since its introduction after the First World War. It is probable that in these countries it was noticed that the clinical course of a tuberculosis illness and/or treatment showed no difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.

This is probably the reason why the WHO (World Health Organisation) conducted a major field experiment in India. A mainly rural area, consisting of 209 villages, a town and a population of about 364,000 about 40km to the west of Madras was determined as the experimental area. The entire population, except infants less than 1 month, was vaccinated with the BCG vaccine….

Simultaneously a second district of a similar size and population was chosen. Here no vaccinations with the BCG vaccine were conducted.

When in 1979, i.e. 11 years after the start of the experiment, the WHO presented its first interim report, it was said, "this interim report was like a shock to the WHO's "experts": "The field study conducted under ideal conditions showed no effectiveness of the BCG vaccine."

In reality the result was even starker. The vaccinated district didn't have the same number of sicknesses as the unvaccinated area (this would have proved the ineffectiveness of the vaccine); no: in the vaccinated area there were significantly more cases of tuberculosis than in the unvaccinated area. This means nothing else than that the BCG vaccine doesn't only offer no protection, but had caused damage.

Only 11 years after the start of the study the result was published. The report is titled:

"Trial of BCG vaccines in south India for tuberculosis prevention: first report” (Bulletin of the World Health Organisation, 57 (5): 819-827 (1979))

Here are the most important parts of the report:

1. The actual protective effect of this vaccination remains therefore questionable.

2. It is clear that the BCG vaccine has no effect whatsoever.

3.The results of the trial show that the vaccination gave no protection in the first 7.5 years after vaccination.

4. The BCG vaccination has been controversial for 50 years.

5. A meeting in February 1978 in Copenhagen of Quality Control Directors from various laboratories confirmed that the vaccines used in the trial had been of good quality.

6. In summary it can be said that the current study has shown that the BCG vaccination gives no protection against the bacterial illness.

It took another 4 years before Director and Professor DR. med. W. Brehmer of the Robert-Koch-Institute of the Bundesgesundheitsamt (Health Ministry) in Germany reported this field trial in "Bundesgesundheitsblatt" (Year 26, nr. 5, May 1983, p 145)

"When the WHO published the first evaluation of this trial after a 7 1/2 year observation period in 1979, there was general consternation. The completely negative result shocked the international experts and was discussed in the press with reference to future vaccination policy under headlines such as "Bad news from India". However, in the German trade press, which usually gives high prominence to a further public recommendation of unspecific BCG vaccination of new borns, this important result was hardly mentioned.

Information on the vaccination recommendations of the Ständige Impfkommission (permanent vaccination commission) at the Robert-Koch-Institute (STIKO) Tuberculosis

In view of the epidemiological situation in Germany, the non-provability of the effectiveness of the BCG vaccination and the often grave unwanted medicinal effects of the BCG vaccine; the STIKO can no longer recommend this vaccination.

Robert-Koch-Institute March 1998

…. So the STIKO took 27 years to take this vaccination of the recommended list of vaccinations after the ineffectiveness of BCG vaccinations became known.

This behaviour can only be explained by the fact that those responsible shied away from publishing a result that was so embarrassing and disgraceful for them. In the sanatoria the ineffectiveness of the vaccination was generally known by the begin of the 1960s, while it was still being vehemently defended by the vaccination advocates for another 40 years."

End of quote

Smallpox

The WHO'S mass vaccination programme with the small pocks vaccine in India showed similar results. After every programme there were small pocks epidemics. Based on these experiences smallpox was taken off the list of recommended vaccinations in 1970.

Source: Dr. G. Buchwald, "Impfen, das Geschäft mit der Angst", Droemer Verlag

Homeopathic View

What is optimum protection?

• Natural Birth
• Nursing/Breast Feeding, Balanced Nutrition
• A loving Environment
• Trust in the Body's Ability to Heal Itself
• Constitutional Remedies When Necessary